Slate market · Curated stalls · Free shipping over $75
Login Register

givi yamaha mt 09 tracer bauletto monokey trekker outback evo smart alluminio nero 42 lt obkev42b slr101 sr2122 m5 2015 2017 mpn-trk35bn 1173fz m5 Pair of 44-litre side cases mpn-alp44b2 3113fz m5m

SKU: 3618747188
4.6
EUR269.50 EUR294.50 Market pick

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $67.38 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 1 - Nov 6

Market notes

Details · Returns
Description

givi yamaha mt 09 tracer bauletto monokey trekker outback evo smart alluminio nero 42 lt obkev42b slr101 sr2122 m5 2015 2017 mpn trk35bn 1173fz m5 Pair of 44 litre side cases mpn alp44b2 3113fz m5m Pair of 44 litre side cases in aluminium with MONOKEY® CAM SIDE fitting and SMART SECURITY LOCK Developed to offer unparalleled comfort during long journeys The Trekker Outback EVO SMART 42 is the new top case from the GIVI range The new friction rotation system for the lid

Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for givi yamaha mt 09 tracer bauletto monokey trekker outback evo smart alluminio nero 42 lt obkev42b slr101 sr2122 m5 2015 2017 mpn-trk35bn 1173fz m5 Pair of 44-litre side cases mpn-alp44b2 3113fz m5m

What should I clarify if an offer has location restrictions?

Review any relevant limitation before completing the transaction. Use the existing order reference if a restriction appears afterward.

How can I confirm an agreement discussed by phone or in person?

Do not replace an existing order reference with an invented identifier. Check whether an agreed exception requires another person's approval.

What should I check if checkout reports a payment problem?

Read the displayed message carefully rather than assuming every error has the same cause. Compare the relevant records before assuming an amount was charged twice.

You may also like

recommand products